# Publication review notes

The three supplied files are preserved unchanged. No license was supplied.

The original auditClaims labels any positive lexical overlap as supported. This is not a conservative factual-support test: a contradicted or invented claim can share words with a source. Its example does not demonstrate reliable unsupported-claim detection. Source-bound prompts request behavior; they do not enforce model compliance.

The website uses a separate adaptation in browser/src/lib/public-examples/source-bound-review.ts. It reports related source candidates and term-overlap scores while keeping every draft claim marked needs-review. It constructs prompt text from the eligible, budgeted packet. No model is called and no semantic or factual verification is claimed. The original sample remains available for comparison in this folder.

No sample, tests, build or type check was executed in this integration.